2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (197 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (270 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 75 L |
