2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Voyager. (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Ranger | Voyager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2860 mm |