2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Rover 216. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 216 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 55 L |