2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 TVR Griffith (225 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 TVR Griffith should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 TVR Griffith. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 TVR Griffith (373 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 TVR Griffith will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | Ranger | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3944 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 57 L |
