2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1993 Volvo 850
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Volvo 850 (225 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Volvo 850. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Volvo 850. (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1993 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 850 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 73 L |