2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (66 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |