2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 842 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (280 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ranger | SLK |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 53 L |