2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Cima weights approximately 322 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1995 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Cima |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1770 mm |