2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mini MK VI. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Ranger | MK VI |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2040 mm |