2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 115 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2730 mm |