2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Renault 19
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault 19 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1996 Renault 19. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault 19.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault 19. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1996 Renault 19 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 19 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 55 L |
