2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Acura EL
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura EL would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1997 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura EL.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura EL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1997 Acura EL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Ranger | EL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2619 mm |