2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | Midge |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
