2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Ranger | Smart |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1460 mm |