2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace. (226 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1997 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1960 mm |