2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Volvo S90
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo S90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo S90 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1997 Volvo S90. (177 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Volvo S90.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Volvo S90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo S90. (260 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo S90.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1997 Volvo S90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | S90 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |