2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Plymouth Neon

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Neon would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Neon. (131 HP @ 5850 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Neon.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Plymouth Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Neon. (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Neon.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 1998 Plymouth Neon
Make Ford Plymouth
Model Ranger Neon
Year Released 2006 1998
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2299 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 131 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5850 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 174 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4950 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 79 L