2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Ranger | Pronto Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2650 mm |
