2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotus GT 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotus GT 1 would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 469 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1806 kg more than 1999 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (390 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ranger | GT 1 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 3504 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 573 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 390 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2690 mm |