2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2730 mm |