2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | SUW |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 74 L |