2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
