2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 1999 Nissan R 391 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan R 391 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | R 391 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |