2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Proton Tiara
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Proton Tiara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Proton Tiara would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1999 Proton Tiara. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Proton Tiara.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Proton Tiara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Proton Tiara.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Proton Tiara | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Ranger | Tiara |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2290 mm |