2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 50 L |