2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki Baleno. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 632 kg more than 1999 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Baleno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki Baleno. (106 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1999 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Ranger | Baleno |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 51 L |