2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Kia Shuma
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2000 Kia Shuma. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Shuma.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Kia Shuma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Shuma. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2000 Kia Shuma | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Ranger | Shuma |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2570 mm |