2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 323.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2000 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 109 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |