2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Arosa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Arosa would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Arosa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | Arosa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2850 mm |