2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Volvo S60

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S60. (138 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S60.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo S60. (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2000 Volvo S60
Make Ford Volvo
Model Ranger S60
Year Released 2006 2000
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 2434 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 206 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 324 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 90 mm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 84 L 70 L