2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2001 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda 626.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 626. (230 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2001 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 64 L |