2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Nissan Alpha
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Alpha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Alpha would be higher. At 4,490 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Alpha is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Alpha (301 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Alpha should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Alpha (359 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Alpha will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2001 Nissan Alpha has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Alpha will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2001 Nissan Alpha | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Alpha |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 4490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |