2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Nissan Fusion
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan Fusion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan Fusion would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2001 Nissan Fusion. (134 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan Fusion.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan Fusion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Fusion (372 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2001 Nissan Fusion has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Fusion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2001 Nissan Fusion | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Fusion |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 372 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2960 mm |