2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Renault Clio (230 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Renault Clio. 2001 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2001 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |