2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Explorer (212 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Explorer (390 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Explorer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 390 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2840 mm |