2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Honda Acty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Honda Acty would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2002 Honda Acty. (127 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Honda Acty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Honda Acty | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Acty |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |