2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (367 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ranger | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2380 mm |