2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Mazda 6

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 6.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 6. (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2002 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Ranger 6
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 206 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 324 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 84 L 64 L