2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Proton 300
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Proton 300 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2002 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 300.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Proton 300 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Ranger | 300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2450 mm |