2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 910 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Ranger | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 22 L |