2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Tata E
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Tata E would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Tata E should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 345 kg more than 2002 Tata E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Tata E | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Ranger | E |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2810 mm |