2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar R-D6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar R-D6 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1362 kg more than 2003 Jaguar R-D6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (500 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar R-D6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ranger | R-D6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 500 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 69 L |