2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Renault Be Bop
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Be Bop. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Be Bop would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Be Bop (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Be Bop should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Be Bop. (300 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Be Bop.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2003 Renault Be Bop | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | Be Bop |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 60 L |