2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2004 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Ranger | Yukon |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 325 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 140 L |