2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Peugeot 607

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Peugeot 607. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Peugeot 607 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Peugeot 607 (160 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Peugeot 607. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Peugeot 607. (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Peugeot 607. 2004 Peugeot 607 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Peugeot 607 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2004 Peugeot 607
Make Ford Peugeot
Model Ranger 607
Year Released 2006 2004
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 2229 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3900 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 19.8:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1248 kg 1403 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.1 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 66 L