2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 556 kg more than 2004 Toyota Sequoia.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 99 L |