2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 486 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (367 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2005 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Ranger | Canyon |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 367 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 93.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 72 L |