2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Ranger | K2700 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 60 L |
