2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Lincoln Aviator
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (149 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 666 kg more than 2005 Lincoln Aviator.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln Aviator (407 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (244 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln Aviator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2005 Lincoln Aviator | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Ranger | Aviator |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 2190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 85 L |