2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 147 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1495 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 82 L |